By Mark Turner (auth.), David H. Helman (eds.)

In the previous few years, there was an immense volume of job within the learn of analogy and metaphor. this can be partially as a result of an curiosity of man-made intelligence researchers in simulating studying methods utilizing analogy. It additionally arises from serious examinations of normal theories within the philosophy of language, with their built in literal/meta­ phoric contrast. This quantity includes fresh formerly unpub­ lished paintings during this region, with a selected emphasis upon the function of analogies in reasoning and, extra ordinarily, their function in proposal and language. The papers are contributed by way of philosophers, desktop scientists, cognitive scientists and literary critics. Researchers in those fields whose concentration is the examine of analogy and metaphor will locate a lot of curiosity during this quantity. those essays may also function an creation to a few of the key techniques taken within the research of analogy. As famous, this quantity brings jointly the paintings of researchers in numerous diverse disciplines. a number of the methods serious about recognize to the certainty of analogy are usually quite various, besides the fact that, the articles recommend a typical end. Analogy and metaphor pervade concept and language; their shut research therefore constitutes a worthy contribution to our realizing of individuals. DAVID H. HELMAN Case Western Reserve college vii half I CONCEPTUAL AND specific THEORIES OF ANALOGICAL realizing MARK TURNER different types AND ANALOGIES i would like to pursue the next claims: the way in which we categorize is helping clarify the way in which we realize an announcement as an analogy.

Show description

Read Online or Download Analogical Reasoning: Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Science, and Philosophy PDF

Similar cognitive books

The Roots of Reference (Paul Carus Lectures)

"Our in basic terms channel of knowledge concerning the global is the effect of exterior forces on our sensory surfaces. So says technological know-how itself. there isn't any clairvoyance. How, then, will we have parlayed this meager sensory enter right into a full-blown medical thought of the realm? this is often itself a systematic query.

Computing the Mind: How the Mind Really Works

In a fruits of humanity's millennia-long quest for self wisdom, the sciences of the brain are actually able to supply concrete, empirically tested solutions to the main basic questions on human nature. What does it suggest to be a brain? How is the brain relating to the mind? How are minds formed by means of their embodiment and setting?

Digital Cognitive Technologies: Epistemology and the Knowledge Economy

Electronic Cognitive applied sciences is an interdisciplinary e-book which assesses the socio-technical stakes of data and conversation applied sciences (ICTs), that are on the center of the data Society. This booklet addresses 8 significant matters, analyzed via authors writing from a Human and Social technology and a technology and expertise point of view.

How Things Shape the Mind: A Theory of Material Engagement (MIT Press)

An more and more influential college of proposal in cognitive technological know-how perspectives the brain as embodied, prolonged, and dispensed instead of brain-bound or "all within the head. " This shift in standpoint increases vital questions on the connection among cognition and fabric tradition, posing significant demanding situations for philosophy, cognitive technological know-how, archaeology, and anthropology.

Additional info for Analogical Reasoning: Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Science, and Philosophy

Example text

Analogy is a basic means by which form, pattern, and connection emerge in our understanding and are then articulated in our reflective cognition and in our language. In other words, I am arguing 40 M. , in our understanding) and not merely in our abstractive reflections on our experience. Department of Philosophy Southern Illinois University Carbondale USA NOTES I Donald Davidson, "What metaphors mean," Critical Inquiry 5, no. 1 (1978), 31-47. , p. 47. 3 John Searle, "Metaphor," in his Expression and Meaning (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979),76-116.

The Chomskyan model for language can be adjusted to take care of the problem. Over the years, Chomsky himself has made many changes in the model, and here I will mention only the most esesntial components and ignore the revisions that do not need to be considered in this discussion of metaphors. In the classical model, there is the Base Component with phrase structure rules like "Sentence -+ Noun Phrase + Verb Phrase" and lexical rules that replace abstractions like "Noun Phrase" and "Verb Phrase" with actual words in keeping with lexical insertion rules.

In the basic metaphor (16), Nom 2 cannot precede Nom 1 because that would produce the ill-formed structures 50 P. K. SAHA (20)(a)*A serpent is a thankless child. (b)*A serpent is the thankless Goneril. A metaphor may now be defined as a linguistic structure in which a definite or indefinite nominal (Nom 1) is analogically related in a specific language and in a specific context to one or more general (or generalizable) assumptions concerning an indefintie nominal (Nom 2). Since the emphasis in this theory is on the relationship established between Nom 1 and Nom 2, the overall theory may be called the relational theory of metaphor.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.49 of 5 – based on 32 votes